Re: Ant

[Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>]

On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 11:11:54PM +0100, Berke Durak wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 11:04:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 10:56:52PM +0100, Berke Durak wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > Ant is quite nice, I think someone should package it.
> > 
> > Please go ahead, i think it is a great idea too.
> 
> Oh wait, I didn't mean it that way...
> 
> By someone, I meant : "someone but not me" ;)  Ara is taking enough of
> my time for now.

Well, my strong guess is that if you don't do it, nobody will find the time
to.

> > Next step would be to integrate it with advi and some advi effect editor or
> > something.
> > 
> > Notice that ant is already taken by a java tool though.
> 
> Yes, that's a problem.  Plus the executable is also named ant.  And it's
> not a negligible package.
> 
> I humbly suggest that the best thing would be to rename it.

Yep, already had that discussion with upstream two years ago. 

Friendly,

Sven Luther