Re: Accepted mldonkey 2.5.28-1 (powerpc source)
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 12:30:29AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 05:41:42PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:02:13AM -0400, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> > > Changes:
> > > mldonkey (2.5.28-1) unstable; urgency=high
> >
> > Please avoid in the future such uploads, using urgency=high with a new
> > upstream release and a lot of changes like those described in your
> > changelog is an abuse.
> >
> > I understand the desire to see a package in testing, but raise the
> > urgency is reasonable only for minor changes.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
>
> Hello,
>
> Sorry, for this upload, let me defend me a bit : at the time i use this
> urgrency, i was thinking that mldonkey was the last package blocking
> ocaml. It is the reason i use such an urgency.
>
> I know, that this release is not worth a urgency=high, and i have
> discussed this matter with Sven on #debian-ocaml-maint. We come to the
> conclusion, that if there is another RC bugs against mldonkey before
> Sarge release, we will use an older release ( ie 2.5.16g ), patch it
> enough to compile with ocaml 3.08 and upload to testing-proposed-update
> ( maybe it is a bit confused -- or wrong, if Sven want to give more
> details, or correction ).
>
> So, again i am sorry to have used this urgency, i was just believing
> that i was the last to upload ocaml package and block all other
> package...
Notice that it doesn't matter anyway, as mldonkey is no more in testing, since
it has been force-removed to allow ocaml 3.08 to enter, and that it will be
entering testing only when it is fully build, and the librsvg2/nautilus mess
has sorted itself out. Which it should nextly, i think.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: