Re: ocaml 3.08.1 and testing migration.
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 08:52:44AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have launched my little script and rebuilt almost all package with 3.08.1.
> It seems that except for coq, none of the other package have any problem with
> it, not there seem to be any binary incompatibility, since i built those
> packages with the installed ones (that is, lablgl built with 3.08.0 was used
> to build lablgtk2 and so on).
>
> So, once we have a fix for coq, i will upload 3.08.1 together with the new
> coq.
>
> As for the testing migration, of all the packages listed as directly
> uninstallable (mostly the libraryes) at :
>
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=ocaml;expand=1
>
> the following need building still :
>
> cameleon: ia64
Taken from this build :
cd doc && /usr/bin/make
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/cameleon-1.3/doc'
convert main_window.jpg main_window.eps
make[2]: *** [main_window.eps] Bus error
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cameleon-1.3/doc'
make[1]: *** [manual] Error 2
Strange, it seems there is an error which come from the convert
command... ( i don't think that main_window.eps is problematic in itself
).
What should i do ?
> camlcreal: hppa
> ocamldbi: arm s390 sparc
> editex: arm mips
> mlgmp: hppa
> lablgtkmathview: arm mips
> ocamlodbc: s390
>
> Which is a real progress compared to previous days, especially many arm
> packages have been uploaded yesterday, and mips ones too.
>
> Of the not really dependent packages, whcih may still be problematic, those
> are more difficult to round. I will name only the few i can think of :
>
> coq: needs a 3.08.1 fix and an arm build.
> advi: arm ia64 mips s390
> spamoracle: ok.
> unison: arm s390
>
What about mldonkey ?
> BTW, i would like you all to consider the spamoracle package. It builds both a
> native compiled version on the native arches, and a bytecode one. This means
> that we are totally free of the slower autobuilder, since it will never get
> build on mips, mipsel and s390. We have arm still though.
>
Maybe i miss something, but i don't understand what does it means ? How
could it be possible ?
> If you have other such non-library packages, please list them with their
> status in a reply to this mail.
>
> But all in all, the transition is in a pretty good shape, and i am confident
> that we are going to make it.
>
I have still problem with mldonkey... I don't know if i will have enough
time to fix it. I am working on my side to correct as many errors as
possible...
Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall
Reply to: