Bug#262791: rebuild with libtiff4, upload with urgency=medium
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:33:53PM +0200, sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:58:43AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 08:14:14PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> > >
> > > Severity: Serious
> > > Justification: FTBFS
> > > Package: libcamlimages-ocaml
> > >
> > > As of version 2.12-2, package libcamlimages-ocaml has not yet been
> > > rebuilt with libtiff4. Please rebuild the package with libtiff4 and
> > > upload with urgency=medium. Note that taking care of this problem is
> > > a prerequisite for ultimately being included in sarge, even if a
> > > version of this package already appears in testing. No source changes
> > > are required; updating dependencies and rebuilding should be
> > > sufficient. All packages not uploaded within several days will be
> > > NMUed. Many thanks for your patience and cooperation.
> >
> > Bullshit, camlimage 2.12-6 is in unstable, and built against libtiff4. Closing
> > this bug report because of it.
> >
>
> No it is not really bullshit, i made a post on -devel this morning.
> There is still a 2.12-2 package for all arch expect sparc and powerpc.
> The rebuild of the package is waiting for a lablgtk/lablgtk2 rebuild on
> all arches ( expect sparc and powerpc ).
Well, sure, but bugs are against source packages, so ... If i should fill a
bug every time the powerpc (or god help me, the m68k or mips) autobuilder is
lagging behind, there would be no end of it.
> Kind regard
> Sylvain Le Gall
>
> ps : however, you are right to close the bugs, since the latest version
> of the package is not concerned by this FTBFS...
Sure. Now, camlimage depends on libdb3, which conflicts with libdb4.2 used by
apache and mod-caml :/
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: