> with ocaml 3.08-0. Still no usefull description, but the double items are gone > now. What is your take on this bug with relation to the above ? In my opinion this bug could be downgraded to a "wishlist". Having no description of the manpage is OK, but having one would be better. -- Laurent Bonnaud. http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/