Re: splitting up the ocaml package: summary
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 03:21:49PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 14:20, sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org wrote:
> > liblabltk-ocaml labltk stublibs
> > liblabltk-ocaml-dev liblabltk-ocaml labltk header
> I wouldn't mind those, except it might not be clear if this was a
> different Tk lib than that distributed with ocaml.
>
> > libbase-extra-ocaml extra stublibs
> > libbase-extra-ocaml-dev libbase-extra-ocaml extra header
> I think this name makes no sense. having 'base' and 'extra' together
> is confusing.
>
> > libgraphics-ocaml graphics stublibs
> > libgraphics-ocaml-dev graphics header
> Since these would contain only ~5 files each, this seems a little excessive.
> The graphics stuff should be combined with the labltk.
>
> Well, I'm just about done with the patch using the names as before. It
> isn't too much of a pain to change the them, but it will be annoying. I
> don't see the need to change.
> --
Hello,
Well, what about :
libcompilers-extra-ocaml in place of libbase-extra-ocaml.
For the split graphics/labltk, we could include graphics in
liblabltk-ocaml, but we need to state this in short/long description...
If you could include it in your patch, i will be very thankfull to you.
Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall
Reply to: