On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 14:20, sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org wrote: > liblabltk-ocaml labltk stublibs > liblabltk-ocaml-dev liblabltk-ocaml labltk header I wouldn't mind those, except it might not be clear if this was a different Tk lib than that distributed with ocaml. > libbase-extra-ocaml extra stublibs > libbase-extra-ocaml-dev libbase-extra-ocaml extra header I think this name makes no sense. having 'base' and 'extra' together is confusing. > libgraphics-ocaml graphics stublibs > libgraphics-ocaml-dev graphics header Since these would contain only ~5 files each, this seems a little excessive. The graphics stuff should be combined with the labltk. Well, I'm just about done with the patch using the names as before. It isn't too much of a pain to change the them, but it will be annoying. I don't see the need to change. -- Mike Furr <mfurr@debian.org> 1024D/124B26F3 5B9F 587F BC5C D823 50CE 4DB0 ED93 CA29 124B 26F3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part