On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 01:37:39PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> FWIW, ocamldbi supports both, and can do so simultaneously. So, for the
> moment, I suppose I'll build both interfaces; end-user apps will Do The
> Right Thing via deps, I believe.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean with "via deps". I suppose it's
an ocamldbi build time choice which binding is used, right? So as soon
as we will have the new bindings in the archive I suggest you to rebuild
ocamldbi against the new binding only.
> I would hope that people would use OcamlDBI for this and not write code
> for any particular database.
ocamldbi is still not that widespread, I'm sure there's a lot of
database specific code already written.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature