On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:29:35PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I think we should better have a naming convention for camlp4 syntax > estension instead of picking randon names. What about restating our > current libraries naming convention into something like lib<foo>-camlp4? No other comments? Should I assume that this proposal is ok and write the corresponding policy paragraph? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature