On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:29:35PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I think we should better have a naming convention for camlp4 syntax
> estension instead of picking randon names. What about restating our
> current libraries naming convention into something like lib<foo>-camlp4?
No other comments? Should I assume that this proposal is ok and write
the corresponding policy paragraph?
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature