Re: ocaml-bdb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 08 March 2004 06:16 am, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:34:59PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[snip]
> > But please in the future ask here before publishing somewhere packages
> > with Maintainer: field set to "Debian OCaml maintainers ...". Of course
> > you're free to do it, but it can lead to confusion, as the first mail of
> > this thread proves.
But of course. That package was in no way published; Evan must be pretty good
with Google. ;)
> Also, i would greatly appreciate that a prerequisite of such packages
> would be to be in the subversion repo on alioth, since it would be
> somewhat unfriendly to us to make us responsible of the bug that may be
> in the package (as the Maintainer field claims) without the source of
> the package being accessible in the canonic way for such packages.
But of course. The only reason it has not been placed in the subversion
repository is that I was unable to verify the upstream tarball at the time
(because of the savannah compromise and downtime on yminsky's server). I
will try to get to this in the next day or two. For that matter, since news
of its existence has leaked, you are welcome to put it there yourself. ;)
Seriously though, I would like advice on the package name before it is checked
in. Given that there seem to be at least two OCaml Bdb bindings, am I doing
the right thing with ocaml-bdb-ym (source) and libbdb-ym-ocaml{,-dev}
(binary)?
> Friendly,
>
> Sven Luther
Cheers,
- - Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQFATLhSVDidajON4cURAgwjAJiFG2IeacjNObxLo9ADOJO4z9HfAJoDReKT
M45cSvYUWVPrMsGv/EatNQ==
=/l7O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: