[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ocaml-bdb



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 08 March 2004 06:16 am, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:34:59PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[snip]
> > But please in the future ask here before publishing somewhere packages
> > with Maintainer: field set to "Debian OCaml maintainers ...". Of course
> > you're free to do it, but it can lead to confusion, as the first mail of
> > this thread proves.

But of course.  That package was in no way published; Evan must be pretty good 
with Google.  ;)

> Also, i would greatly appreciate that a prerequisite of such packages
> would be to be in the subversion repo on alioth, since it would be
> somewhat unfriendly to us to make us responsible of the bug that may be
> in the package (as the Maintainer field claims) without the source of
> the package being accessible in the canonic way for such packages.

But of course.  The only reason it has not been placed in the subversion 
repository is that I was unable to verify the upstream tarball at the time 
(because of the savannah compromise and downtime on yminsky's server).  I 
will try to get to this in the next day or two.  For that matter, since news 
of its existence has leaked, you are welcome to put it there yourself.  ;)

Seriously though, I would like advice on the package name before it is checked 
in.  Given that there seem to be at least two OCaml Bdb bindings, am I doing 
the right thing with ocaml-bdb-ym (source) and libbdb-ym-ocaml{,-dev} 
(binary)?

> Friendly,
>
> Sven Luther

Cheers,
- - Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFATLhSVDidajON4cURAgwjAJiFG2IeacjNObxLo9ADOJO4z9HfAJoDReKT
M45cSvYUWVPrMsGv/EatNQ==
=/l7O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: