Re: meta-ocaml out of date
Sylvain,
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:23:40PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:46:01PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:44:10PM +0100, sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org wrote:
> >
> > > I think we can also move packages/ocaml-tools to projects/ocaml-tools,
> > > since there is no real upstream apart from us who are injecting things
> > > in it...
> >
> > I don't understand. Of course there is an upstream - in fact there
> > are (at the moment) three of them. We just merge them into one
> > orig.tar.gz tarball, and build the package from it.
> Well, correct me if i am wrong : all upstream ( the one who put small
> files together, not the real up-upstream ) are all debian developper and
The only upstream(s) are those who author the files. The people
who bundle them are not upstream.
> the version of the package is tightly bound to debian ( ie this
> collection of file is targeted to debian )...
No, the version number is tightly bound to the date.
> If this is the case, i think it is more interesting to use projects/ so
> we can easily add/remove/manage files.
Why? ocaml-tools is a package, not a project. I don't understand
what you are aiming at.
-Ralf.
--
Reply to: