On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 03:12:21PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > And what about the BTS, and other developer infrastructures ? It's all on the debian CVS, it's (or it should be) just a matter of installing them on another machine. > And in particular, does that mean that we will drop ocaml-doc, > ocaml-books-en and ocaml-books-fr ? No, that we move them to this new "non-free debian" project. It's up to each maintainer to decide to keep on maintaining the package or not, personally I've ever maintained ocaml-book and I'm interested in maintaining it in the future. > Yeah, except the burden will be on the developers of non-free stuff, > which have more interesting things to do with their time. Do you think so? And why they don't have more interesting things to do _now_ instead of maintaining non-free packages in debian? Cheers. -- ^Stefano Zacchiroli - Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy$ ^zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -- http://www.bononia.it/zack$ ^Frequentando il mio maestro mi ero reso conto [.] che la logica poteva$ ^servire a molto a condizione di entrarci dentro e poi di uscirne -Adso$
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature