Re: findlib 1.x's features (includes shining new METAs for lablg*)
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 07:56:13PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 06:38:39PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, i will make the changes to lablgl, lablgtk and lablgtk2. Should i
> > wait for findlib to having been built on all arches, and do we need to
> > add a findlib (>= 1.0.2) dependency and/or build-dependency ?
>
> Good question (formula used each time one doesn't know how to answer).
>
> No need to build-depends on it, METAs are just copied at the end of the
> build process. For the depend: technically the library shipped with
> those META doesn't needs findlib, _but_ those new file wont work (I
> guess) with older findlibs. So is probably better to depend on findlib
> greater than 1.0.2 indeed.
Or a build-depend for those package which use findlib for building. Does
something such exist ?
> This will imply that lablg* packages wont be installable until findlib
> gets built, which is in turn stucked by ocaml-nums in the NEW queue.
Nope, ocaml-nums escaped the NEW queue this week, no problem then.
> I've uploaded powerpc package, I can also upload an i386 package just to
> miminiza users' trouble ... What do you think of this proposal?
Let's wait a few days so most auto-builders catch on, and then i will
upload fixed packages.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: