Re: lablgtk, camlimages, advi, cameleon and libpng.
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:35:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:49:12PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Quoting Sven Luther <email@example.com>:
> > >
> > > I thus propose the following plan, and an alternative plan below it :
> > >
> > > Plan A:
> > >
> > > - we rename lablgtk2 to lablgtk, and it becomes our default lablgtk.
> > > - lablgtk2 is linked with libpng12.
> > > - camlimage is built with it.
> > > - we rename current lablgtk as lablgtk1 for compatibility reasons.
> > > - cameleon is either fixed to build with lablgtk2.
> > I have no real idea but I'm not sure it is wise to make such
> > changes if we want to keep our packages in a releasable
> > state in testing.
> What about uploading lablgtk1, which does provide lablgtk and slowly
> migrate the dependency on lablgtk to dependencies on lablgtk1.
> The real question, is what to do about camlimages. Stefano has said he
> has not much time about for it, and it is problematic.
> Will we keep a camlimages1 and a camlimages2 packages, or could we just
> go with a camlimages packages which builds on lablgtk2 ?
> What is cameleon's exact dependency on camlimages anyway ?
I really don't think changing the name of lablgtk will change anything
and it will give more work to us to migrate dependency...
And i don't think it can give us anything ( or i don't see the point ).
Sylvain LE GALL