[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: advi as collective maintainership ?



On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:07:15PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 08:51:52AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I am lacking the time for doing a good job with advi, as can be seen
> > with the many bug reports i have against it.
> > 
> > So, i am considering doing the collective maintainership for it, with
> > still me for the main maintainer, or straight out orphaning it, but i
> > don't know if there will be someone who will pick it up in this case.
> > 
> > Any opinion on this, and is there more to it than simply uploading with
> > the new maintainer/uploaders fields ?
> > 
> > Advi is already in the subversion repository.
> > 
> > Friendly,
> > 
> > Sven Luther
> > 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I think i can do some packaging help on advi... The main problem is for 
> you : i am not a DD ( and i begin desesparating about this ). So i will 
> recontact Sven or any one willing to help a poor non DD.

This would be unproblematic.

> Kind regard
> Sylvain LE GALL
> 
> ps : i will begin to work tomorrow on it

Cool.

> pps : Sven any hint, upstream version, anything problematic ? ( not
> counting the bugs report ) 

Well, mostly bug reports, especially the state of the examples and such.
There is also the idea Stefano suggested for gzipped .dvi support, or
the camlzip solution to the same problem.

Finally, if you feel heroic, you could look into the wishlist bugs about
PS font support, but this is more of an upstream job.

Mostly, i don't really consider advi in releasable state if the example
stuff is not solved, and this is the main issue.

Also, make sure you check out the subversion version, i have a 1.4.0-5
ready to be uploaded, which fix some dpatch brokeness.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: