Re: patch - add an ocaml-interp binary package

[Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>]

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 02:44:32PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Sven Luther said:
> > So, if you want to run ledit, you would need to download 1Mo of
> > packages, instead of just 150Ko + 27Ko of ledit.
> 
> Good point. I would rather prefer splitting ocaml-interp as proposed then.

:))

> BTW, I prefer the full "ocaml-interpreter" or, better, "ocaml-toplevel"

Me too.

> since that's the exact purpose of the package. Strictly speaking the
> interpreter is ocamlrun which interprets ocaml bytecode, ocaml is the
> toplevel ...

I will go for ocaml-toplevel then, unless there is reasoned oposition
about this.

Friendly, (Altough i am told saying it like that has no meaning in
english, and i should say "in a friendly way" or perhaps friendlishly).

Sven Luther