On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 10:30:14AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > - gmetadom (out of date on i386)
> Am currently building it.
Thanks, I've seen the upload.
> Already pinged Bastian Blank, but you can ask debian-s390 if you want.
Done.
> But we have a worse problem, look at :
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=liblablgtkmathview-ocaml-dev
> And you will see that we picked up a dependency on atk1.0 which is 3/10.
It doesn't seem to me that troublesome ... the funny thing is that is a
dependencies caught by dh_shlibdeps and gtkmathview has probably no need
to use the latest atk version, anyway ...
> Maybe we could ask for the removal of gtkmathview and lablgtkmathview
> from testing, and they will enter again in 7 days, or just wait one
No, sorry, but an additional week it doesn't seems a good enough reason
to ask for the removal of a package from testing. I also think thas a
similar objection will be raised by the testing guys ...
> more week. Your call Stefano, altough i would favor the removal
> myself, so we can go forward.
Is anyone waiting for any important upload here?
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/
" I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant! " -- G.Romney
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature