On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 02:59:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > I've just rebuilt a local ocaml package including the patch 2 and it > > seems to work fine without introducing binaries incompatibilities. > Yep, Xavier confirmed that to me. Also, i doubt any existing code uses > that feature yet, so we are safe from it for the next week or so, since ... You're wrong: CDuce already uses that feature :-) > > If the formar: do we think that it's wise? Ocaml packages should enter > > all together in testing and lablgl is only 4 days old and still we have > > to solve the bignum issue ... Is it possible to fix and upload the ocaml > > package now? > I prefer not, especially as the patch has not yet (to my knowledge) > reached its definite form. Ok, but at least is official, while the one we actually ship is not. Anyway, it's ok for me to wait for ocaml to enter testing, _but_ if you have to do another upload before the testing migration then please drop the current camlp4 patch and apply bugfix patch 2. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/ " I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant! " -- G.Romney
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature