On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 02:59:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I've just rebuilt a local ocaml package including the patch 2 and it
> > seems to work fine without introducing binaries incompatibilities.
> Yep, Xavier confirmed that to me. Also, i doubt any existing code uses
> that feature yet, so we are safe from it for the next week or so, since ...
You're wrong: CDuce already uses that feature :-)
> > If the formar: do we think that it's wise? Ocaml packages should enter
> > all together in testing and lablgl is only 4 days old and still we have
> > to solve the bignum issue ... Is it possible to fix and upload the ocaml
> > package now?
> I prefer not, especially as the patch has not yet (to my knowledge)
> reached its definite form.
Ok, but at least is official, while the one we actually ship is not.
Anyway, it's ok for me to wait for ocaml to enter testing, _but_ if you
have to do another upload before the testing migration then please drop
the current camlp4 patch and apply bugfix patch 2.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/
" I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant! " -- G.Romney
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature