Re: Should we fill RFP against all sort of interesting ocaml stuff ?
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 07:32:59PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 03:10:09PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 01:54:25PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:14:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:21:51PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > > > > *****************
> > > > > Not interesting :
> > > > > *****************
> > > > > Package: ant-ocaml
> > > > > URL: http://www-mgi.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~blume/Download.html
> > > > > Authors:
> > > > > Description: Typesetting system inspired by TeX
> > > >
> > > > Hey, ant is great, i almost did package it myself. It is not all that
> > > > mature yet, but it may in the future, combined with advi, make for a
> > > > killer presentation tool.
> > >
> > > So why didn't you issue an ITP for it?
> >
> > Because it is not yet quite ready, and most of all, because i hadn't the time.
> >
> > Friendly,
> >
> > Sven Luther
> >
> >
> Re hello,
>
>
> I forget to ask : where should i upload the TODO list ? ( svn surely but
> with what package, i was thinking at policy directory ).
Maybe the policy directory needs to be moved into a new directory which
would also contain this document. I don't have a good idea for a name
though, but SVN makes this kind of stuff easy.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: