[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [xavier.leroy@inria.fr: Re: [Caml-list] Copyright Clarifications]



Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr> writes:

> Quoting Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>:
>
>> But, this will happen only after the testing migration is completed, so,
>> as said, business as usual, there will still be time to make high
>> priority cleanup later on, if it is needed.
>
> Err, no, we must not allow ocaml 3.07 to enter testing if it
> violates policy. Either we get a new license from HP or we repackage
> ocaml.  Debian policy is not secondary.

Well, I agree that the Debian policy is not secondary, but as the
version in testing already contain the non free code, we don't have
to stop the testing migration. but we have to solve this problem.

-- 
Rémi Vanicat
remi.vanicat@laposte.net



Reply to: