On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:21:54PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Err, no, we must not allow ocaml 3.07 to enter testing if it violates > policy. Either we get a new license from HP or we repackage ocaml. > Debian policy is not secondary. Actually ocaml 3.06 have exactly the same problem (cfr otherlibs/num/README) and it's not only in testing, but also in _stable_! So I can't see the point in blocking ocaml 3.07 entering testing for _this_ particular reason. If we wont be able to fix the license problem, the ocaml package (no matter which version) should be _removed_ from the archive, no matter which version. So why inhibit 3.07 enter testing? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/ " I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant! " -- G.Romney
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature