Re: Possible licensing problem of otherslibs/num

To: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Possible licensing problem of otherslibs/num
From: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:35:47 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1065425747.3f811b538422a@imp2-a.free.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20031005213335.GA12646@iliana>
References: <[🔎] 1065386612.3f808274af6b5@imp3-a.free.fr> <[🔎] 1065386788.3f808324a2655@imp3-a.free.fr> <[🔎] 20031005213335.GA12646@iliana>

Quoting Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>:


> > The doc subdirectory is no longer there, however ...
> 
> What was the response of the ocaml team about this ?

I haven't asked.

-- 
Jérôme Marant

Reply to:

References:
- Possible licensing problem of otherslibs/num
  - From: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
- Re: Possible licensing problem of otherslibs/num
  - From: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
- Re: Possible licensing problem of otherslibs/num
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

Prev by Date: Accepted ulex 0.2-3 (powerpc source)
Next by Date: Should we fill RFP against all sort of interesting ocaml stuff ?
Previous by thread: Re: Possible licensing problem of otherslibs/num
Next by thread: Re: Possible licensing problem of otherslibs/num
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread