Re: [xavier.leroy@inria.fr: [Caml-list] Objective Caml 3.07 final release]
- To: Sylvain LE GALL <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>
- Cc: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>, Debian Ocaml Maint ML <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: [xavier.leroy@inria.fr: [Caml-list] Objective Caml 3.07 final release]
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 08:49:18 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20031001064918.GA2488@iliana>
- In-reply-to: <20030930223750.GB5335@grand>
- References: <20030930125839.GA1843@fistandantilus.takhisis.org> <1064928747.3f7985eb11ab1@imp1-a.free.fr> <20030930151707.GB5599@iliana> <1064935290.3f799f7a91c0d@imp1-a.free.fr> <20030930163207.GA6393@iliana> <20030930173925.GC946@grand> <1064955041.3f79eca186912@imp2-l.free.fr> <20030930205538.GB31233@iliana> <1064955727.3f79ef4f6439d@imp2-l.free.fr> <20030930223750.GB5335@grand>
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:37:50AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:02:07PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Quoting Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>:
> >
> > > > Releasing the CVS version of cameleon is out of question anyway.
> > >
> > > So we either ship old version of cameleon or don't ship it, if the new
> > > cameleon is not ready.
> >
> > Exactly.
> >
>
> Today, cameleon compile on 3.07. But there is no release...
>
> I think maxence could agree to do a release for 3.07, but it won't be a
> major release ( regarding the effort made for the port to lablgtk2 ).
Mmm, could you please provide us some kind of overview of the cameleon
situation ? As i understand it, lablgtk2 support is not ready yet, but
the lablgtk1 support should be ok.
Jacques told me he want to make a non beta version of lablgtk2 available
soon, if i understood him correctly at least, but since he is probably
busy with the 3.07 bug, i suppose it may happen later on.
BTW, do we need a cameleon 1 and a cameleon 2 for lablgtk1 and lablgtk2
support ?
Also, would people disagree if i rename the lablgtk package to lablgtk1
(keeping the provide to lablgtk for now maybe).
> I think we should say : there will be a cameleon in sarge.
Ok.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: