Re: packaging ocamake ...
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 09:46:45AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have the intention of providing ocamake as part of debian. Strange
> > wording you would say, but the problem is that ocamake is right now only
> > a simple .ml file and a .html doc. It would be kind of ridiculous to
> > ship a package with just it in it, but to what other package could it be
> > added.
> >
> > Ocaml-tools comes to mind, but Ralf has said that he considers
> > multi-source packages problematic, and i am not maintaining it.
> >
> > What do you all think of this, do you think ocaml-tools could be one of
> > the first packages handled in a cooperative way on the new project, and
> > that various people could maintain sub-parts of it or something such ?
> > It would still need a new release each time one of the packages is
> > upgraded, but this could be done independently by each sub-maintainer ?
> >
> > Ralf, what do you think of it ?
>
> If ocamake is really small and arch-idependent then it should go into
It is just :
-rw-r--r-- 1 luther luther 5660 2003-05-20 16:20 ocamake.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 luther luther 21179 2003-05-20 16:20 ocamake.ml
I suppose that building bytecode only would count as being
arch-independent, right ?
> ocaml-tools. I also agree to have it maintained by the ocaml cooperative :-)
> I guess that this can wait until we have our subproject at alioth?
Yes, there is no urgency.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: