Re: ocaml compiled binaries and rpath
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 06:06:32PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
[...]
> We were talking about the fact that lablgtkmathview is the only
> problematic example since it is the only binding depending on
> another binding. I was just saying that every Gtk widget binding
> is such an example (unless you just put all the bindings together
> in the same .so which is the one provided by lablgtk. As a consequence
> the run-time dependencies of lablgtk .so increase and with them also
> the debian package dependencies). This is totally unrelated to on-demand
> libraries, isn't it?
Sure, but you wrote
] IMHO this approach can not scale up well, since it is adding more
] and more dependecies to the lablgtk package.
so I had the feeling that you were looking for alternatives.
Denis
Reply to: