Re: ocaml compiled binaries and rpath
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 12:21:56PM +0200, Remi Vanicat wrote:
> Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 11:20:57AM +0200, Remi Vanicat wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> This in not completely true. One could want to write a binding for a
> >> gtk widget not in lablgtk, without having to modify lablgtk, while
> >> using some of the lablgtk function. Then it could be useful to link
> >> the new stublib to the lablgtk one.
> >
> > I would be glad to accept any such patch to lablgtk, and i guess so will
> > upstream.
> >
> > In fact that is the way we did it when adding SVG support to
> > lablgtk2.
>
> well, lablgtkmathview is such a binding, and nobody seem to complain.
>
> lablgtkmathview is even a more complicated example seem it use also
> the gdome binding.
Yes, see my other mail as response.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: