[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: status update?



On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 09:56:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 09:33:27AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 12:06:39PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >   o I upload my ocaml-3.06 package, which altough it is not yet the real
> > >     one i wanted, will enter testing because nothing is holding it, and
> > >     with it will go most of the libraries and executable packages.
> > 
> > Could you elaborate a bit more on this solution? What do you plan to
> > change in such a package?
> 
> I take the packages at people.debian.org/~luther, and upload them. These
> are the ones Jerome complained about though, so it may be problematic.
> They are ready and installed on my machine since a month or so though.
> Basically they are the same package as the ocaml ones, just renamed to
> ocaml-3.06.
> 
> The next step would be to rename all executables to -3.06 or something
> such, but i would not like to do that before the 3.07 release, i think.

Ok, if nobody disagrees, i will upload ocaml-3.06 to the archive. This
would take time, as it is a new package and such, but it should be
transparent for the rest of the ocaml stuff.

I don't believe any of the other solutions can really be solved without
intervention of people outside the debian-ocaml team (us that is),
intervention which we are very unlikely to get, and get responded by a
fix the RC bugs (in postgresql, libvorbis, etc ...) :(((

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: