Re: Accepted camlimages 2.11-1 (i386 source all)
- To: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Accepted camlimages 2.11-1 (i386 source all)
- From: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:58:07 +0100
- Message-id: <20030213165807.GA20475@iliana>
- In-reply-to: <20030129082352.GB23750@lordsoth.takhisis.org>
- References: <E18cBCf-0007LO-00@auric.debian.org> <20030128121004.GB4224@iliana> <20030129082352.GB23750@lordsoth.takhisis.org>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 09:23:52AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 01:10:04PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Mmm, you did not respond to me about building a libpng2 version of
> > camlimage and a libpng3 version of camlimage depending on lablgtk2.
>
> Sorry I was a bit busy in the last days, I will look at it again today
> ...
I have uploaded camlimages 2.11-1 packages which use lablgtk2 and
libpng12-0 to apt-source :
deb: http://people.debian.org/~luther/ocaml ./
If these seem right to you, you could just upload those, and i can then
upload my lablgtk 1.2.5-8 package that close your bug.
I believe this is ok to do, because altough lablgtk2 still lacks support
for the gnome libraries, it now has again glade and opengl support. I
don't know if many people really use the libgnome support in conjunction
with camlimages, if there is any doing this, please speak now. Also, in
in the lablgtk2 i will upload tomorrow, there will be support for
librsvg.
BTW, could you add lablgtk2 to the list of packages that get subscribed
to debian-ocaml-maint mailing list ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: