Re: Accepted lablgl 0.99-5.1 (i386 source)
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 04:49:04PM +0100, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 03:25:27PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> >> En réponse à Sven Luther <luther@debian.org>:
> >>
> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> > Hash: SHA1
> >> >
> >> > Format: 1.7
> >> > Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:52:49 +0100
> >> > Source: lablgl
> >> > Binary: liblablgl-ocaml-dev liblablgl-ocaml
> >> > Architecture: source i386
> >> > Version: 0.99-5.1
> >>
> >> -x.y versions are for NMU only!
> >
> > Err, these are autobuilder-checking version, i will remove them once i
> > found the real reason behind the bug, and upload a true 0.99-6, they
> > will also not appear in the changelog.
> >
> > BTW, do any of you have something against me providing a lablgl package
> > which depends and build depends on mesa instead of xlibmesa ? Apparently
> > the xlibmesa packages are something broken dependency-wise, for now at
> > least. This should not cause any problem for packages built with the
> > mesa packages to run on xlimesa using systems. Even Hardware accel
> > should work.
>
> Well, I may be one of the user that might have the problem, because
> I'm using the nvidia driver and openGL, so if I could try your package
> before...
Well, the mesa packager told me this is no problem, that a mesa 5.0
built package should run without problem with any mesa library, even the
xlibmesa ones, or the mesa ones that come with your proprietary driver,
and that they will be accelerated. You can fetch 0.99-5.1 and 0.99-6 out
of incoming, or wait until tomorrow, but i think there will be no
problem. If there is, i can always do a new upload, the autobuilder are
quick to build right now.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: