Re: Accepted lablgl 0.99-5.1 (i386 source)
Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 03:25:27PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> En réponse à Sven Luther <luther@debian.org>:
>>
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > Format: 1.7
>> > Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:52:49 +0100
>> > Source: lablgl
>> > Binary: liblablgl-ocaml-dev liblablgl-ocaml
>> > Architecture: source i386
>> > Version: 0.99-5.1
>>
>> -x.y versions are for NMU only!
>
> Err, these are autobuilder-checking version, i will remove them once i
> found the real reason behind the bug, and upload a true 0.99-6, they
> will also not appear in the changelog.
>
> BTW, do any of you have something against me providing a lablgl package
> which depends and build depends on mesa instead of xlibmesa ? Apparently
> the xlibmesa packages are something broken dependency-wise, for now at
> least. This should not cause any problem for packages built with the
> mesa packages to run on xlimesa using systems. Even Hardware accel
> should work.
Well, I may be one of the user that might have the problem, because
I'm using the nvidia driver and openGL, so if I could try your package
before...
--
Rémi Vanicat
vanicat@labri.u-bordeaux.fr
http://dept-info.labri.u-bordeaux.fr/~vanicat
Reply to: