Re: ocaml-3.06 3.06-16 ready to be tested ...
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 04:28:03PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> En réponse à Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>:
>
> > > Nowdays, people use versioned packages with versioned binaries
> > > and a default package which provides symlinks.
> >
> > Yes, that is what i will do. Will we also go this route for libraries
> > ?
>
> What's the problem with them?
Fine with me, we decided against it last time though.
Basically, there are two issues, the one is the ocaml dependency, the
other the interlibrary stuff.
We would finish with something of the kind (for library foo).
libfoo-1.2.5-ocaml-3.06 and libfoo-1.2.5-ocaml-3.06-dev.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: