On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:53:22AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > IMO we should fallback on >=/<< dependencies for build-dependencies and
> > keep on using virtual names for dependencies.
> But what about using only the >= dependencies and dropping the << ones ?
[ I'm assuming that your question is related to build-dependencies ]
Uhm ... well yes, we can drop the << and avoid some auto builders delay,
but we still have to reupload a new package each time we like it to be
rebuilt against a new library bumping the >= dependency ...
IMO we can go for it, Jerome?, someone else?
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli - Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/
" I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant! " -- G.Romney
Attachment:
pgp3yF2Phd3dv.pgp
Description: PGP signature