[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Cameleon build failures



On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:09:37PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> En réponse à Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>:
> 
> 
> > What is the problem here ? 
> 
> Bus error, as the log shows.

Maybe a hardware problem on the sparc build box ? Or a result of the gcc
3.2 transition on sparc ?

> > Why do you rebuild the full ocaml, this is not needed, and i am
> > seriously thinking of scrapping the ocaml-source package, in favour of
> > the following practive.
> 
> Why do you want to scrapp something I need? The point is that I get a
> bus error.

Because i don't like ocaml source.

> >   1) i may ship some files some people need in their packages if they
> >   are well identified and there is a reason for them being there.
> > 
> >   2) package who need some of the files of ocaml-source should
> > integrate
> >   said files in their package. This should be only a few files.
> 
> I already worked on this and it is far more complicated than
> shipping some files. In my case, there are so many dependencies,
> that it is simple to build against a self-compiled ocaml-source. 

This is something i need to discuss with your upstream i think, not you.

> > I know we already discussed this on this list some time back, i will
> > have to check the list archive, which i cannot do right now. In the
> > meatime i wouldlike to have :
> > 
> >   1) a list of packages (and maintainers) which use ocaml-source, so
> >   each of you who use ocaml-source, please tell it to me, and tell me
> >   what exactly you need.
> 
> I need ocaml-source.
> 
> >   2) a list of non-packaged stuff which needs ocaml-source, or people
> >   who use it for their personal need. 
> 
> I don't see any problem in providing such a package. I don't
> understand why you suddenly want to remove it.

I never liked it, it is huge, and not really needed.

> >   3) The opinion of Maxence on the cameleon issue. I know that Maxence
> >   is susbcribed here, but i will cc him just in case.
> > 
> > depending on the ocaml source is really a loosy way of coding, i know
> > sometime it cannot be helped, but let's try to avoid that as often as
> > possible.
> 
> I'm ceasing camelon packaging anyway, so I'm not going to be
> annoyed by your choices.

I am not going to remove ocaml-source, just seeing if it cannot be
removed.

Friendly,

Sven Luther
> 
> --
> Jérôme Marant <jerome@marant.org>
>               <jerome.marant@free.fr>
> 
> http://marant.org
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: