[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: buildd and virtual (build) dependencies :(((



On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 11:31:50AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Now, James Troup, which maintain the sparc and arm autobuilders did
> contact me and told me i should no more use virtual build-depends, and
> as i wanted some more info, and was a bit too insistent, he decided not
> to speak to me anymore :(((.

Well James Troup contacted me too as you can see from the To: field of
the mail :-)

> autobuilders, and should best find another solution, or maybe someone
> else could approach James about the subject, maybe someone who had
> problems with his packages also, and try to get to the heart of what the
> problem really is. James was kind of saying that i am uninformed and that

I've already sent him a mail asking for more information on the subject,
basically about the reason behind his mail, because a "please don't use
virtual build dependencies" message isn't really self-explaining :)

I'm still waiting for an answer ...

I suggest to wait just another day or two and then go for another
revolution getting rid of all virtual build dependencies, both on ocaml
package and between libraries.
BTW, wait just a bit more patching the policy with my latest patch, we
will probably have to restate hit in term of versioned dependencies for
the 'build-dep' side.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli  -  Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
 zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/
 "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
 sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney

Attachment: pgpYC3jadmL2A.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: