[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Last problem with cameleon



En réponse à Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>:

> On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 07:06:32PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Or modify the policy to accomodate them ? :)))
> 
> Policies aren't jails, but guidelines.
> 
> If you like to better specify that really-really-really-small
> libraries
> can be embedded in 'program' packages, go for it, but IMO it isn't
> really usefull.
> 
> The question here is a bit different, IMO: can the libraries you are
> talking about be useful for other ocaml programs and/or developers? It
> this is the case it can be useful to package them in a separate
> package
> even if they are really small, otherwise not.

I don't know really. For the cases I mentioned, upstream
thinks it is not worth shiping them separately.

For example, you used to package zoggy with its library within.
Perhaps you could explain your logic here, so we can understand
what to do. 

Cheers,

--
Jérôme Marant <jerome@marant.org>
              <jerome.marant@free.fr>

http://marant.org



Reply to: