[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: <pkg>-byte again



On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 03:16:56PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> En réponse à Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>:
> 
> > On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 02:28:30PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > En réponse à Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > >   No, I created usr/share/doc/ocaml-zoggy from
> > > > ocaml-zoggy-byte.dirs.
> > > > 
> > > > Erm, ... ok, and you did move all the stuff that normally goes
> > into
> > > > usr/share/doc/ocaml-zoggy-byte to this dir by hand ?
> > > 
> > > Yes. What I move manually for ocaml-zoggy is moved manually for
> > > ocaml-zoggy-byte. But that's all. What is copied by dh_* scripts
> > > follows the link usr/share/doc/ocaml-zoggy-byte.
> > 
> > :)))
> > 
> > Ok, this is fine, i will write something about this in the
> > ocaml_packaging_policy, and apply it to spamoracle as an example.
> 
> So shall I go for it or shall I wait for my return from vacation to
> see if others want to comment?

You can wait, but i think nobody will object, it makes sense to do it
that way, dh_link makes the job easy, and it does not seem to introduce
any new difficulties or complications.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: