On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 11:25:04AM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote: > >Fix dpkg so it handles versioned provides ? > OK. Give me one hour. Ok, you've had your hour, is dpkg fixed now? :-))))) > >BTW, i choose the -byte suffix for bytecode programs, do you think this > >is a good choice ? > I don't have any better idea. Does someone have something better to propose > in there ? Uhm ... no, but IMHO it's not really better than an ugly Provides field. As you wish Jerome, both are ugly and both work :) Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
Attachment:
pgpg8QdLA3BBj.pgp
Description: PGP signature