[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ocaml 3.06 in testing



On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 05:49:06PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 05:43:29PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > Here is what http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_output.txt has
> > to say about ocaml :
> > 
> > skipped: ocaml (478+4)
> >     got: 32+0: a-32
> >     * alpha: libcamlimages-ocaml, libcamlimages-ocaml-dev,
> >       libconfigwin-ocaml-dev, libgdome2-ocaml, libgdome2-ocaml-dev,
> >       libgdome2-xslt-ocaml, libgdome2-xslt-ocaml-dev, liblablgl-ocaml,
> >       liblablgl-ocaml-dev, liblablgtk-ocaml, liblablgtk-ocaml-dev,
> >       liblablgtkmathview-ocaml, liblablgtkmathview-ocaml-dev,
> >       libmlgtk-ocaml, libmlgtk-ocaml-dev, libnetclient-ocaml-dev,
> >       libocamlnet-ocaml-dev, libpcre-ocaml, libpcre-ocaml-dev,
> >       libpgsql-ocaml-dev, libpxp-ocaml-dev, libsdl-ocaml,
> >       libsdl-ocaml-dev, libshell-ocaml, libshell-ocaml-dev,
> >       libxstr-ocaml-dev, libzip-ocaml, libzip-ocaml-dev, ocamltk, zoggy
> 
> I've checked all packages of mine included in the list above against
> update_excuse.html.
> They are all "valide candidate" except:
> - libpgsql-ocaml-dev as you already know
> - libpxp-ocaml-dev which is reported as out of date of sparc, but this
>   is wrong!, as you can see from
> 
>     http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparc&pkg=pxp&ver=1.1.92-3
> 
>   pxp was successfully built on sparc also on October 5th!

Well, the problem is that the packages are built on the autobuilder, but
need to be signed by the buildd maintainer, James Troup, and that since
vore.debian.org was down end of september due to a dead powersupply,
there is some waiting time for this. Just wait a few more days, and if
it does not improve, ask him wbout it. Anyway, there are other packages
who need yet 5 or so days before being considered, and the fact that the
sparc build arrives late does not enter in the day counting, only the
original release.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: