[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Shall we state on naming (again)?



On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:46:27PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> Well, i did see a Depends: ocaml-base (>= 3.06) in one package i will
> not name. This will most assuredly break if ocaml 3.07 is bytecode

Please: name it or at least fill a bug report against it.

It can be a packages of mine, but I don't like to check out all of them
if I know that someone (you) already discovered the incriminated
package.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy
zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro
"I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney

Attachment: pgp1EIktdf_Ut.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: