Re: Cameleon packages almost done

[Jérôme Marant <marant.logatique@fr.thalesgroup.com>]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 02:22:59PM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
>  
> > > Hum, yes, but not for all. For example, cameleon native and bytecode versions differ because the bytecode version allows the plug-in loading, but native version is faster. For tools where native and byte code versions do the same, I agree that I should only compile byt OR native. I'll do this in the future.
> > > But keeping bytecode AND native is good, isn't it ?
> > 
> >   If there aren't any good reason for keeping both, users won't understand.
> >   Are cameleon binaries the only ones to behave differently in Cameleon?
> >   (BTW, what binaries from the cameleon directory behave a different way?)
> 
> Excuse me, i forgot a part of the sentence :
> But keeping bytecode AND native *FOR LIBRARIES* is good, isn't it ?
> 

  This is _way_ different :) I strongly agree with you about libraries.

  Cheers,

-- 
Jérôme Marant