Re: Cameleon packages almost done
Jérôme Marant <marant.logatique@fr.thalesgroup.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have almost finished the preparation of the Cameleon packages
> (Thanks Dimitri Ara for upstream fixes).
>
> However, I still have some wonderings:
> - as defined by upstream, all cameleon libraries are being
> installed in /usr/lib/ocaml/cameleon, so how do I manage
> META files?
There is tree mean :
- move each library in a different repertory (well, I think it's
better to stay with upstream wish)
- create some empty directory containing only the META information
- use predicate
> - Cameleon provides IoXML which is a Camlp4 syntax extension.
> We don't have any naming policy for syntax extensions.
> (Stefano proposed ocaml-ioxml because he thinks that ioxml
> is too generic)
seam good.
> - what naming policy should I use for ocaml program that have
> a quite generic name (for example "report"). Should I use
> a ocaml- prefix? How do we consider a program name is
> too generic?
well :
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?word=report&searchmode=searchfiles&case=insensitive&version=unstable&arch=i386&directories=yes
list 32 pages of package with a file whose name contain report. Seem
to be a good indication that this name is too generic.
--
Rémi Vanicat
vanicat@labri.u-bordeaux.fr
http://dept-info.labri.u-bordeaux.fr/~vanicat
Reply to: