Re: Hi, packaging mldonkey, rpath + other questions
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:04:33PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> I think he ment just have one binary-all package. One for all, not one
Right!
I haven't yet understood if there is a gain in having a nativecode
executable of mldonkey ...
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy
zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro
"I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
Attachment:
pgpF0c24WXXMM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Hi, packaging mldonkey, rpath + other questions
- From: Goswin Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Re: Hi, packaging mldonkey, rpath + other questions
- From: Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: Hi, packaging mldonkey, rpath + other questions
- From: Goswin Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Re: Hi, packaging mldonkey, rpath + other questions
- From: Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: Hi, packaging mldonkey, rpath + other questions
- From: Goswin Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Re: Hi, packaging mldonkey, rpath + other questions
- From: Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: Hi, packaging mldonkey, rpath + other questions
- From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Re: Hi, packaging mldonkey, rpath + other questions
- From: Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: Hi, packaging mldonkey, rpath + other questions
- From: Goswin Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>