On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:25:10AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > Stefano, you don't understand, do you ? Probably not, I'm assuming that the two packages are interchangable, if you are talking about mldonkey composed by two complementary package (one arch:all and one arch:any), never mind. For the rest of the mail I will assume that the two packages are interchangable. > If we split the package, there will be 1 arch: all package with the > bytecode executable available for all arch, and 1 arch: any package per > arch supporting the native code compiler, with the native code compiler. > > Sure it makes for 1 more package on the native code compiling arches, > but the bytecode package would be shared by all arches not supporting > it. I'm only posing this question: is really needed a native code executable of mldonkey if we already have a bytecode executable with "Arch: all"? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
Attachment:
pgp0snF3Jz0ZV.pgp
Description: PGP signature