On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > Great. I will build a bytecode binary-all and a optimised with > > arch=i386,alpha,...<archs that have ocamlopt>. > > Yes, you could also split the package in two binaries, the first one > being a bytecode package, and arch: all, the other being a native code > package and arch: <list of supported arches>. Please consider if there is a real need to have both version of the package? Is mldonkey a cpubound software? If this is not the case and if the user can have no advantages in using a nativecode version then go for a bytecode-only arch:all version. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
Attachment:
pgpdN08W4ohku.pgp
Description: PGP signature