On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 09:03:32AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Maybe I'm wrong, but actually I think that yes. If you look at the > update_excuses (for some reason I cannot check right now), > there is an entry for packages which are out of date (in case there is > already a package for an earlier version), but none if the binary is > simply missing. I've already met with this problem and reported in on debian-mentors IIRC: update_excuses does not tell you that the binary is missing _but_ the package will not enter testing. I also observed with mentors that this is really stupid because if one package don't have binaries on any architectures you will see nothing on update_excuses but your package will never enter testing. Stupid :-(, but true. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
Attachment:
pgpprdNoYoHok.pgp
Description: PGP signature