Re: ocamlopt issue
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 09:03:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 08:50:24AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 07:37:18AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > But, if the missing build depend is a true build depend, then the
> > > package cannot be build without it, and the autobuilder will fail
> > > to
> > > build the package, and then the missing binary package on all the
> > > supported arches will stop the package from entering testing.
> >
> > Only if there are already binaries for this architecture and a
> > previuos
> > version in the archives.
>
> Are you telling me that if i create a new package it will be entering
> testing without having been built for all the supported architectures
> ?
Maybe I'm wrong, but actually I think that yes. If you look at the
update_excuses (for some reason I cannot check right now),
there is an entry for packages which are out of date (in case there is
already a package for an earlier version), but none if the binary is
simply missing.
-Ralf.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: