Re: Buglet in ocaml-ldconf
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 02:06:31PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:16:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > > -(altough i don't understand why, and especially why woody has not yet
> > > > been released).
> > >
> > > RC bugs in base and standard in woody.
> >
> > But zhere the plan not to let the not base and standard stuff evolve
> > until all RC bugs in base and standard are fixed, and then freeze base
> > and standard, and have a little while for fixing remaining RC stuff in
> > non base and standard ?
>
> I don't really know what's happening and I neither succeed in getting
> info about this from the release manager who BTW doesn't bother answering
> personal enquiries, but I'm repeating myself ...
>
> Base and Standard are meant to be frozen since last december, however
> they seem to contain security flows.
> It seems also that it is possible to upload packages to
> woody-proposed-updates but I don't know what are the criteria for the
> packages to be included in woody.
Yes, thought so, ...
Anyway, my personal opinion on this , is that as the release manager did
say, woody is closed since april 30, and i am awaiting the woody release
impatiently. Anyway, i have much more urgent things to do than wortk on
debian package right now, so this suite me well :)))
That said, if a very important or security related bug does appear, i
will naturally fix it an bug the RM to have it included in woody. This
not seeming to be the case right now, i am taking a little break from
maintenance, and do some real life work instead.
That said, i find that all this woody release stuff is a mess, and would
benefit from some more transparency.
That said, let's hope woody + 1 fares better than that and that we will
learn from the experience.
BTW, Xavier don't likes ocaml-ldconf :(((
What do you all thing about it ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: