Re: Testing: lablgtk seems broken and does not build
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 02:11:20PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
> Some (good) news:
>
> 1) the problems with the out-of-the-box version of the package were
> just due to "yet another change" to the list of cma/cmo in the META file.
> In particular, the package that just entered woody still have a wrong
> META. Let's wait for the next one still in unstable.
Ok, ...
(but this seems to be a point against using findlib ...)
> 2) The building problems are still there. They are probably due just to
> a missing build-dependency I can't figure out.
They are due to a bad mesa library, like said in the other mail. I will be
looking at it a bit more though to be sure this error don't appear again.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: