Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Sven wrote:
>
> Maybe, but i will not touch the ocaml package for such trivial stuff before
> ocaml 3.04-9 enters testing.
Yes, of course it is more important now that 3.04 gets into woody. My
suggestion concerns, as I said, the log run.
> That said, i am not really sure much would be gained by it, especially now
> that i test the emacs stuff before uploading :)))
That is good news :-)
-Ralf.
--
Reply to:
- References:
- lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@fr.thalesgroup.com>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@fr.thalesgroup.com>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Sven <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Sven <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@fr.thalesgroup.com>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Sven <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Prev by Date:
Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- Next by Date:
Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- Previous by thread:
Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- Next by thread:
Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- Index(es):