Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 04:55:04PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 04:31:44PM +0100, Sven wrote:
> > I am a vim user also, and i would vote for keeping the dependency as it was,
> > it cause no problem having it or not, it can alsways be removed later on.
>
> Not really, because tuareg-mode depends on emacsen while ocaml only
> suggests emacsen. So depending on tuareg-mode force the user to install
> something that provides emacsen.
Mmm, yes, i see ...
But then, i guess this depend could be removed or something such, to have the
same situation as is the case with the ocaml-mode.
But then again, it is sensible that for someone wanting to install the
tuareg-mode, that he installs emacsen also.
Ralf, what is your position on this ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to:
- References:
- lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@fr.thalesgroup.com>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@fr.thalesgroup.com>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Sven <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Prev by Date:
Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- Next by Date:
Re: advi 1.0.0-1 uploaded (i think)
- Previous by thread:
Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- Next by thread:
Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- Index(es):